Segunda edición Jornada Investigación Emergente en Psicología 15-10-26

Segunda edición Jornada Investigación Emergente en Psicología 15-10-26

Second edition Emerging Research Day in Psychology 15-10-26

by Colegio Oficial de la Psicología de Madrid · View the channel on PSI

Life & Natural Systems Psychology JSociety and Social SciencesJMPsychology
🎙 Colegio Oficial de la Psicología de Madrid 👥 12K 📅 October 19, 2026 ⏱ 132 min 👁 54 📄 original study 🧭 2026-10-20
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

threat processingpolyvagal theoryfreezing responseheart rate variabilityresilience

Summary

The video records the second edition of an emerging research conference in psychology held by the Official College of Psychology of Madrid, in collaboration with the Complutense University’s Faculty of Psychology. The program includes presentations of award-winning doctoral research from the X Congress of Doctorate. The opening speeches emphasize the value of evidence-based practice and bridging academic research with professional application. The first presenter, Sergio Calvo García, connects from Canada to discuss the role of relaxation in threat processing, focusing on cardiac responses such as heart rate changes and heart rate variability. He explains the theoretical foundations including the polyvagal theory and neurovisceral integration, then elaborates on the defensive cascade, particularly the freezing response observed in many species. He reviews experimental paradigms showing bradycardia during threat and the distinction between accelerators and decelerators in heart rate responses. He also presents his own research using machine learning (autoencoders) to classify cardiac response patterns and correlates them with EEG activity. Subsequent presentations by other doctoral researchers are introduced but not detailed in the transcript. The event aims to foster dialogue between researchers and practitioners, promoting scientific rigor and critical thinking in psychology.

190 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides a valuable overview of current doctoral research in psychology, particularly highlighting the physiological correlates of threat processing. The first presentation offers a thorough explanation of cardiac responses as indicators of defensive states, supported by well-established theories and empirical studies. The argumentation is logical and evidence-based, with clear links between neural mechanisms, cardiac activity, and behavioral outcomes. The use of machine learning to cluster cardiac response patterns demonstrates methodological innovation. However, the presentation format limits in-depth discussion of statistical details and potential limitations. The value lies in its ability to inform professionals about emerging research and bridge the gap between academia and practice.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is high, with references to classic and contemporary research (Porges, Thayer, Roelofs, Klorman). The sources are appropriately cited during the talk, and the research appears to follow accepted methodologies. However, the video provides no direct links to the studies or supplementary materials, and the recording is cut off before full methodological transparency. The title accurately describes the conference content, and the scope is clearly focused on emerging research. The institutional backing from a professional psychological association adds credibility, though the limited sample size and preliminary nature of doctoral work imply caution. No conflicting sources were mentioned.

219 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a second edition of a conference on emerging research in psychology, featuring selected doctoral works.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The conference is organized by an official psychological association and features doctoral research selected through a rigorous congress. Presentations are technical and data-driven, but limited time prevents full methodological detail.

Key Moments

Markers derived by PSI from the transcript: the creator did not define chapters.

Cited Sources

  • Polyvagal theory (Porges) — Mentioned as theoretical framework for the heart-brain connection.
  • Neurovisceral integration model (Thayer) — Cited as a model linking cognitive control and heart rate variability.
  • Freezing studies (Roelofs) — Referenced for experimental paradigms on defensive freezing and bradycardia.
  • Klorman et al. (1970s) — Classic study on heart rate responses to mutilation images.

Concurring Sources

  • Porges, S. W. (2011). The polyvagal theory. — Supports the theoretical basis for cardiac indicators of threat.
  • Thayer, J. F., & Lane, R. D. (2000). A model of neurovisceral integration. — Provides evidence for the link between heart rate variability and executive functions.
  • Roelofs, K. (2017). Freeze, flight, fight, fright, faint. — Reviews defensive cascade and cardiac correlates.

Contribution & Novelties

The video’s original contribution lies in showcasing recent doctoral research that integrates psychophysiological measures with machine learning to better understand individual differences in threat processing. The presentation of an autoencoder approach to categorize cardiac response patterns offers a novel methodological advancement. Moreover, the conference format emphasizes translating scientific findings into professional practice, bridging a common gap.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Polyvagal theory — Foundational theory on the role of the vagus nerve in emotional regulation and social engagement.
  • Heart rate variability — Key psychophysiological marker of parasympathetic activity and mental health.
  • Freezing response — Defensive behavior relevant to threat processing and anxiety.

103 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows moderate to good scores across all dimensions. Quantitative and qualitative information are balanced, technical level is appropriate for a professional audience, and reliability is high due to institutional context. The slightly lower technical score reflects the introductory nature of some presentations.

Reliability 7/10