El Colegio Escucha. Acoso escolar. Escuchar para prevenir Actuar para proteger. 05-10-26

El Colegio Escucha. Acoso escolar. Escuchar para prevenir Actuar para proteger. 05-10-26

The College Listens. School bullying. Listen to prevent, Act to protect. 10/05/26

🎙 José Antonio Luengo Latorre 👥 12K 📅 October 7, 2026 ⏱ 83 min 👁 157 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-10-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

bullyingpreventiongood treatmentprotocolrestorative practices

Summary

This video features an in-depth conversation between Antonio Labanda Díaz and José Antonio Luengo Latorre, an educational psychologist and expert on school coexistence. Luengo reflects on his extensive career, noting that since the death of Jokin in 2004, bullying has become a prominent social issue. He emphasizes that bullying is a form of intentional, repeated harm with an imbalance of power, distinct from ordinary conflicts. The discussion stresses the importance of prevention over reactive protocols, which are activated only when the system has already failed. Luengo advocates for a ‘pedagogy of care’ and the cultivation of kindness and good treatment as core values. He highlights the crucial role of the peer group in either enabling or preventing bullying, calling for investment in group dynamics and leadership. He criticizes the overuse of formal protocols, which can create adversarial dynamics, and suggests that restorative practices and silent monitoring by school teams are more effective. The interview concludes with a call to focus on strengthening the positive social fabric of schools.

168 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value of the information lies in the speaker’s practical, field-tested insights rather than theoretical abstractions. Luengo argues convincingly that prevention through proactive social and emotional education is more effective than post-hoc intervention. He supports his claims with illustrative anecdotes and references to successful schools. The argumentation is coherent and passionate, though it lacks empirical evidence or systematic evaluation of outcomes. He challenges common assumptions about protocols and advocates for a more humane, relationship-centered approach, making the discussion valuable for educators and policymakers.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The speaker cites his own extensive professional experience rather than external academic sources. He mentions Aristotle’s Poetics and a quote from Freud, but these are illustrative rather than rigorous citations. The title accurately reflects the content, focusing on listening and protective action. The video is a professional conversation, not a scientific presentation, so the absence of formal references is expected. Despite the lack of peer-reviewed citations, the speaker’s authority and practical expertise give the content credibility.

174 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately captures the video's focus on listening as a preventive measure and acting to protect against school bullying.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The speaker is a highly experienced educational psychologist with 25 years of direct involvement in child protection and school bullying cases. However, the discussion relies heavily on anecdotal evidence and personal experience rather than peer-reviewed studies or systematic data, limiting its scientific robustness.

Key Moments

Contribution & Novelties

This video offers a distinctive perspective by shifting focus from punitive protocols to the positive potential of peer groups and school culture. The speaker’s advocacy for ‘good treatment’ and the ‘pedagogy of care’ as central prevention tools is an original contribution to the discourse on bullying.

Pour aller plus loin :

88 words

Radar Profile

The profile shows high scores in information quantity and moderate in quality and reliability, reflecting the speaker's extensive experience but lack of empirical backing. The technical level is moderate, suitable for a general audience. Overall, the video is rich in practical insights but limited in rigorous evidence.

Reliability 6/10